Ben Davies
  • About
  • CV
  • Research
  • Teaching
  • Contact
  • Blog

First thoughts

The right not to know and the obligation to know

2/12/2020

0 Comments

 
The right not to know and the obligation to know

​Cross-post from the Uehiro Centre's Practical Ethics blog

Most people accept that patients have a strong claim (perhaps with some exceptions) to be told information that is relevant to their health and medical care. Patients have a Right to Know. More controversial is the claim that this control goes the other way, too. Some people claim, and others deny, that patients also have a Right Not to Know.

A number of considerations (harm to the patient; autonomy; privacy) have been marshalled on either side of this debate over the past few decades (e.g. Laurie 2004; Robertson and Savulescu 2001; Herring and Foster 2012; Takala 2019). In this post, I focus on a distinct argument and its apparently unassailable logic. This is the view that a comprehensive Right Not to Know cannot be justified because in many cases a patient’s ignorance will likely lead harm to third parties (Council of Europe 1997; Rhodes 1998; Harris and Keywood 2001).

Read More
0 Comments

    Author

    An occasionally updated blog, for ideas that aren't publishable (yet). 

    Photo credit: Eli Jones

    Archives

    December 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    May 2019
    February 2019
    February 2018
    November 2017

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • About
  • CV
  • Research
  • Teaching
  • Contact
  • Blog